Adverse Impact Toolkit - Selection Rate Comparison
The Selection Rate Comparison evaluates the passing rates between two groups (e.g., men and women) on a practice, procedure, or test. This is the most conventional type of analysis for making adverse impact determinations, and is modeled after Section 4D of the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures and numerous court cases. The specific tests included are:
- 80% Test: This test compares the passing rate between two groups (e.g., men vs. women) using the 80% test for adverse impact specified in the Guidelines (a "violation" occurs if one group's passing rate is less than 80% of the group with the highest rate).
- Statistical Significance Test (estimated, two-tail): This test uses a statistical procedure (the Hypergeometric Variance formula) to estimate the statistical probability of the observed passing rate difference between groups.
- Statistical Significance Test (exact, two-tail): The Fisher Exact Test (with mid-P correction) is used to calculate the exact probability of the passing rate difference between two groups. Statistically significant values are calculated in the "exact" form and reveal the precision likelihood of the differences occurring by chance.
- Availability Comparison (Single Event)
- Combined Data - Availability Comparison (Multiple Event)
- Combined Data - Pass Rate Comparison (Multiple Event)
For more information about our Adverse Impact Analysis software and outsourcing services, please contact Biddle Consulting Group, Inc. at (800) 999-0438 ext. 102 or eeosales@biddle.com
